Comparison
SecurityAlert vs Bolster
Bolster is AI-driven brand protection in the digital risk protection category. SecurityAlert is the same coverage at a fraction of the cost, self-serve, with no sales motion.
Digital Risk Protection
$25K to $75K per year (typical)
SecurityAlert · $249/mo flat
Them
Bolster
$25K-$75Kper year, typical
AI-driven brand protection.
Where they're strong
- 75% takedowns in <60s via direct registrar API integration
- AI phishing classifier with reported 99% accuracy
- Mature enterprise sales motion
Common gaps
- Per-takedown billing escalates fast
- No flat pricing tier for mid-market
- Bolted-on threat intel (vs. unified)
SecurityAlert
SecurityAlert.ai
$249per month flat · unlimited users
Brand monitoring, threat intel, attack surface, and code-leak scanning. Mid-market price, enterprise depth.
Where we win against Bolster
- $249/month flat vs $50K+/year contracts
- Same coverage on typosquats, phishing, and human-approved takedowns
- Asset auto-discovery via cert/WHOIS/DNS pivots out of the box
- Lookalikes flagged at registration: 200M+ registered domains from ICANN zone files diffed daily
- Self-serve onboarding, no sales call
What we ship
- Brand monitoring (typosquats, app-store, paste sites, human-approved takedowns)
- Actor tracking: registrant + nameserver pivots, standing watches on threat actors
- Governed AI copilot: dual-engine verdict + drafted takedown, you approve
- Threat intel (170+ actors, ATT&CK, CISA KEV, ransomware tracker)
- Owned CVE intelligence: local NVD mirror, 365k+ CVEs + KEV + EPSS + ATT&CK
- Outside-in rating (A+ to F) + infostealer credential exposure
- Cert pivoting + searchable CT history + GitHub leaked-secrets
- 9-protocol email grading + universal lookup (Cmd+K)
Try the same coverage for $249/month flat.
No sales call. No per-finding or per-takedown charges. Free tier with 1 brand monitor and full threat intel browsing, no credit card.
Compare against another vendor