Find brand impersonation
before your customers do.
SecurityAlert watches for lookalike domains, fake apps, leaked credentials, malicious ads, and infrastructure reused by known threat actors. It checks the strongest findings and prepares the takedown for your team to review.
SecurityAlert does the first round of investigation
Instead of sending every possible match to your team, SecurityAlert filters obvious noise, checks the strongest results, and prepares the next step for review.
- It watches continuously. SecurityAlert checks typosquat variations, newly observed domains, Certificate Transparency logs, app stores, public code and package registries, credential feeds, and threat feeds. It also watches known actor infrastructure so a newly registered domain can be flagged as soon as it appears in a monitored zone file.
- It filters obvious noise. Findings are scored and grouped by shared infrastructure before they reach your queue.
- It checks the strongest matches. SecurityAlert visits the suspected site, takes a screenshot, compares it with your real brand, and asks two independent AI models to review the result.
- It prepares the takedown for review. SecurityAlert writes the abuse report, finds the appropriate contacts, and packages the supporting material. Nothing is filed until an authorized person approves it. After filing, the case is checked again on a schedule.
We call this governed Agentic DRP: the software handles the repetitive research and writing, while a person remains responsible for anything sent outside the platform.
What happens from detection to takedown
SecurityAlert uses 13+ typosquat and homoglyph checks, a daily comparison of 224M+ domains across 15 TLDs, Certificate Transparency logs, app stores, GitHub code and gists, package registries, and infostealer credential feeds.
Each match gets a 0-100 risk score. Related IPs, nameservers, registrant details, registrars, certificates, and favicons help group the findings and remove low-confidence noise.
SecurityAlert checks the live page for phishing content, compares its appearance with your real site, and has Claude and ChatGPT review the finding independently.
SecurityAlert writes the abuse report and finds the right contacts at the registrar, host, CDN, certificate authority, and registry. The case also includes related domains found on the same infrastructure. You review and approve it before anything is filed.
After you approve and file the report, scheduled DNS, HTTP, and WHOIS checks follow the case and flag takedowns that have stalled.
Closed cases retain the material used to make the decision. You can export findings to a SIEM or TIP through STIX 2.1, TAXII 2.1, or MISP.
Nothing gets filed without your approval
For each possible lookalike, SecurityAlert writes a verdict of malicious, suspicious, or benign and explains how it reached that conclusion. A second AI model reviews the same finding so you can compare the two opinions. If a takedown is appropriate, the drafted reports wait in a review queue.
The sending gate is off by default. An abuse report can leave the platform only after a person with the right permission approves it. The software saves research time, but your team remains responsible for what is filed in your company's name.
Keep watching the infrastructure behind a campaign
Taking down one domain does not stop the person behind it from registering another. SecurityAlert uses its own WHOIS collection and ICANN zone data to index registrants and nameservers, without relying on a third-party lookup API. You can search by name, email, phone, organization, address, or nameserver and see other domains that share the same infrastructure.
If you watch that infrastructure, SecurityAlert will flag new domains connected to it. In many cases, the domain is still parked when it first appears and the phishing site has not been deployed yet.
Designed for small security teams
Impersonation rarely arrives as one neat incident. A campaign can span typosquat domains, cloned landing pages, fake mobile-app listings, paid ads, and credentials already sitting in stealer logs. Left unmanaged, each one can turn into customer confusion, credential loss, or direct fraud.
Traditional DRP is often sold as an expensive managed service. That can leave a small team choosing between a contract it cannot justify and monitoring the problem by hand.
SecurityAlert's Business plan is $249 a month. It includes continuous monitoring, investigation, and drafted takedowns without charging for each finding or user.
The same plan includes an outside-in security rating from A+ to F and a modeled probable annual loss range, so you can explain the larger business risk without turning every finding into a slide deck.
How the Business plan compares with managed DRP
A typical managed DRP service
- $20,000 to $250,000 a year, usually sold through a sales team
- An analyst service is included in the contract
- The vendor manages takedowns under an SLA
- Pricing and terms are negotiated for each customer
- Quarterly account reviews
- Custom integrations may be available
SecurityAlert Business
- $249 a month with unlimited users; our team attaches Business to the shared workspace
- SecurityAlert prepares the investigation for your review
- Registrant and nameserver watchlists track actor infrastructure
- You review and approve each multi-channel takedown
- The same price applies regardless of company size
- Public changelog, methodology, and status page
- REST API, STIX/TAXII, and MISP feeds for integrations
$249 a month, with no per-takedown fees
The Business plan includes 10 brand monitors, unlimited users, every finding, and every drafted takedown. We do not charge by the investigation, takedown, or seat, so the monthly cost does not change when your team uses the product more heavily.
Start with one brand for free
Sign up and add the domain you want to protect. Monitoring starts the same day, and the free plan does not require a credit card.