← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-98551

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Oct 18, 2026Sources checked Oct 21, 2026
N/ACVSS not listedScore unavailable
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-98551. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Oct 20, 2026

Release Notes

CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-98551?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf/core: Fill branch entries with a single assignment

perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() clears the bitfields of struct perf_branch_entry one by one and leaves from/to alone, since callers overwrite those straight away. The list has to be kept in sync with the struct by hand and has already fallen behind: new_type and priv were added to perf_branch_entry and never added here.

Only BRBE writes those two, and neither for every record. brbe_set_perf_entry_type() leaves new_type alone for a branch type it does not recognise, and priv is not set for source-only records. arm_pmuv3.c allocates the per-CPU branch stack with kmalloc(), so such a record reaches userspace with whatever the slot held: uninitialised kmalloc() data on the first pass over the buffer, the previous record's values after that.

Nothing under arch/x86/events/ writes either field, so only arm64 is affected.

Assign the whole entry at each site instead. Everything not named is then zero, and there is no list to keep in sync.

The bitfields add up to exactly 64 bits, so the struct has no padding to leave undefined.

perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() has no callers left, so remove it. perf_entry_from_brbe_regset() assigns an empty literal instead, since it fills from/to conditionally. PERF_BR_SPEC_NA is 0, so dropping the explicit spec assignment changes nothing.

Source: NVD