← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-97502

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Sep 24, 2026Sources checked Nov 12, 2026
N/ACVSS not listedScore unavailable
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-97502. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 28, 2026

Release Notes

CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-97502?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mmc: davinci: avoid NULL deref of host->data in IRQ handler

mmc_davinci_irq() returns early only when both host->cmd and host->data are NULL:

if (host->cmd == NULL && host->data == NULL) { ... return IRQ_NONE; }

So we may legitimately reach the rest of the handler with host->data == NULL (and therefore data == NULL). The DATDNE branch already guards against this with an explicit "if (data != NULL)" check, but the subsequent TOUTRD ("read data timeout") and CRCWR/CRCRD ("data CRC error") branches dereference data unconditionally:

if (qstatus & MMCST0_TOUTRD) { data->error = -ETIMEDOUT; <-- NULL deref ... davinci_abort_data(host, data); }

if (qstatus & (MMCST0_CRCWR | MMCST0_CRCRD)) { data->error = -EILSEQ; <-- NULL deref ... }

If either bit is set in qstatus while host->data is NULL, the kernel will crash inside the IRQ handler. smatch flags this:

drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:933 mmc_davinci_irq() error: we previously assumed 'data' could be null (see line 914)

Gate both branches on a non-NULL data, matching the existing pattern used by the DATDNE branch.

No functional change for callers where data is non-NULL, which is the only case in which these branches did meaningful work before this change.

Source: NVD