← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-93191

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Sep 17, 2026Sources checked Nov 11, 2026
N/ACVSS not listedScore unavailable
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-93191. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Oct 21, 2026

Release Notes

Vendor-listed releases

  • 6.6.157.1-1
CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-93191?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smack: fix incorrect task context in smack_msg_queue_msgrcv

The smack_msg_queue_msgrcv() function incorrectly checks the permissions of the 'current' task instead of the 'target' task.

In the msgsnd() syscall path, if a receiver is already waiting, the pipelined_send() optimization is used to push the message directly to the receiver task:

ipc/msg.c`pipelined_send(): ` smp_store_release(&msr->r_msg, msg)

In this case, the 'sender' (current) task performs the check on behalf of the 'receiver' task (msr->r_tsk, passed as the 'target' parameter):

ipc/msg.c`pipelined_send(): ` security_msg_queue_msgrcv(,, target := msr->r_tsk,,)

However, smack_msg_queue_msgrcv() ignores the 'target' and checks 'current':

smack_msg_queue_msgrcv(…) ` smk_curacc_msq(isp, MAY_READWRITE); // current task

'current' MAY satisfy smack_msg_queue_msgrcv r/w requirement, but 'target' (the receiver task) might NOT; as a result, an unauthorized receiver gets the message, violating MAC policy.

Test: 1) create a sysv message queue with label “foo” 2) echo "bar foo r" >/smack/load2 3) msgrcv(,,,0,MSG_NOERROR) in "bar"-labeled task. The task is waiting for the messages ...

4) msgsnd() from a "foo"-labeled task: "bar"-labeled task gets the message.

This patch fixes the issue by checking permission on the 'target' task instead of 'current'.

(2008-02-04, Casey Schaufler)

Source: NVD