← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-90200

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Sep 17, 2026Sources checked Nov 3, 2026
N/ACVSS not listedScore unavailable
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-90200. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-90200?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs/ntfs3: fix integer overflow in MFT cluster validation

In ntfs_init_from_boot(), the boot sector's MFT cluster numbers are validated against the volume size with:

if (mlcn * sct_per_clst >= sectors || mlcn2 * sct_per_clst >= sectors) goto out;

mlcn and mlcn2 are u64 fields read directly from the boot sector. sct_per_clst is bounded above by 4096 (true_sectors_per_clst() plus the is_power_of_2() check below it), but the multiplication is done in u64 and wraps when mlcn (or mlcn2) is large enough -- e.g. mlcn near 2^62 with sct_per_clst == 4 wraps to 0, which compares below any non-zero 'sectors', so the check is bypassed and the malformed record is accepted.

The accepted mlcn is then used unchanged in

sbi->mft.lbo = mlcn << cluster_bits;

In practice the resulting reads fail at the block layer (sb_bread() returns NULL via grow_buffers()'s check_mul_overflow() guard), so today this manifests as mount failing in odd places rather than as something more dangerous, but the validation step is still wrong and there is no reason for callers to rely on the block layer to catch a value that should never have been accepted in the first place.

Use check_mul_overflow() to compute the two sector positions and fail the mount if either multiplication wraps; this preserves the existing semantics (mlcn * sct_per_clst >= sectors) instead of switching to division (mlcn >= sectors / sct_per_clst), which would tighten the check at edge cases where 'sectors' is not a multiple of sct_per_clst.

The check_*_overflow() style is the one ntfs3 already uses for similar on-disk arithmetic in fs/ntfs3/run.c.

Source: NVD