← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-89948

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Sep 16, 2026Sources checked Nov 10, 2026
N/ACVSS not listedScore unavailable
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-89948. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Oct 21, 2026

Release Notes

Vendor-listed releases

  • 6.6.157.1-1
CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-89948?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

batman-adv: bla: fix freeing of claims on meshif deletion

When the mesh interface is getting deleted, then batadv_bla_del_backbone_claims() (via batadv_bla_purge_backbone_gw()) could make sure that all claims gets removed. But this function is only executed when bat_priv->bla.claim_hash is not NULL.

And since batadv_bla_free() is always setting it to NULL before it is (indirectly) called, it was never actually executed.

But the batadv_bla_purge_claims() -> batadv_handle_unclaim() is at the moment too fragile because the BLA code is not handling the rehashing in batadv_bla_update_orig_address(). The stored backbone address doesn't have to be the one actually used for the hash bucket selection during the initial adding of the backbone.

The batadv_handle_unclaim() can therefore fail to find the respective backbone for the unclaim and then stop the deletion.

But the actual backbone_gw object is not needed for the unclaim because all relevant information is always provided by the caller. And the check for the existence of the backbone_gw doesn't provide any additional security check for the deletion of a claim.

Source: NVD