CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-74434

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Aug 15, 2026Sources checked Nov 10, 2026

9.8CRITICALCVSS out of 10

What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-74434 and is rated Critical severity with a CVSS score of 9.8. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Oct 2, 2026

Vendor remediation details

This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - ARM64 architecture; - S390 architecture; - x86 architecture; - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers; - InfiniBand drivers; - IOMMU subsystem; - Multiple devices driver; - Network drivers; - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver; - NVME drivers; - TCM subsystem; - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem; - Xen hypervisor drivers; - AFS file system; - File systems infrastructure; - Network file systems library; - Network file system (NFS) client; - NTFS3 file system; - OCFS2 file system; - OrangeFS file system; - SMB network file system; - IPv4 networking; - Sun RPC protocol; - IPv6 networking; - IP tunnels definitions; - Netfilter; - TCP network protocol; - Locking primitives; - 9P file system network protocol; - B.A.T.M.A.

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 30, 2026

Vendor remediation details

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 29, 2026

Vendor remediation details

CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog

EPSS0.6%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability

Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field

Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships

Overview

What is CVE-2026-74434?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Don't move a peeked OOB message onto the pending queue

rxrpc_recvmsg_oob() takes a received oob message off recvmsg_oobq and, if a response is needed, moves it onto the pending_oobq tree. However, only the unlink from recvmsg_oobq is guarded by MSG_PEEK; the move onto pending_oobq always runs.

As a result, reading a challenge with MSG_PEEK leaves the skb on recvmsg_oobq while also adding it to pending_oobq. Since struct sk_buff's rbnode shares storage with its next and prev pointers, rb_insert_color() overwrites the list linkage, and the skb, which holds a single reference, becomes reachable from both queues at once.

When the socket is closed both queues are drained in turn. While draining recvmsg_oobq, __skb_unlink() follows the next and prev pointers that rbnode has overwritten and writes to a bad address.

Also, as the skb holds a single reference but is freed from each queue, both the skb and the connection reference it holds are released twice. This leads to memory corruption and to a use-after-free caused by the connection refcount underflow.

MSG_PEEK does not consume the message from the queue, so only unlink it from recvmsg_oobq and then move it onto pending_oobq or free it when the message is actually consumed.

Source: NVD