← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-72472

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Aug 15, 2026Sources checked Oct 28, 2026
9.8CRITICALCVSS out of 10
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-72472 and is rated Critical severity with a CVSS score of 9.8. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Oct 2, 2026
Vendor remediation details

This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - ARM64 architecture; - S390 architecture; - x86 architecture; - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers; - InfiniBand drivers; - IOMMU subsystem; - Multiple devices driver; - Network drivers; - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver; - NVME drivers; - TCM subsystem; - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem; - Xen hypervisor drivers; - AFS file system; - File systems infrastructure; - Network file systems library; - Network file system (NFS) client; - NTFS3 file system; - OCFS2 file system; - OrangeFS file system; - SMB network file system; - IPv4 networking; - Sun RPC protocol; - IPv6 networking; - IP tunnels definitions; - Netfilter; - TCP network protocol; - Locking primitives; - 9P file system network protocol; - B.A.T.M.A.

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 30, 2026
Vendor remediation details

This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - ARM64 architecture; - S390 architecture; - x86 architecture; - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers; - InfiniBand drivers; - IOMMU subsystem; - Multiple devices driver; - Network drivers; - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver; - NVME drivers; - TCM subsystem; - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem; - Xen hypervisor drivers; - AFS file system; - File systems infrastructure; - Network file systems library; - Network file system (NFS) client; - NTFS3 file system; - OCFS2 file system; - OrangeFS file system; - SMB network file system; - IPv4 networking; - Sun RPC protocol; - IPv6 networking; - IP tunnels definitions; - Netfilter; - TCP network protocol; - Locking primitives; - 9P file system network protocol; - B.A.T.M.A.

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 29, 2026
Vendor remediation details

This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - ARM64 architecture; - S390 architecture; - x86 architecture; - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers; - InfiniBand drivers; - IOMMU subsystem; - Multiple devices driver; - Network drivers; - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver; - NVME drivers; - TCM subsystem; - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem; - Xen hypervisor drivers; - AFS file system; - File systems infrastructure; - Network file systems library; - Network file system (NFS) client; - NTFS3 file system; - OCFS2 file system; - OrangeFS file system; - SMB network file system; - IPv4 networking; - Sun RPC protocol; - IPv6 networking; - IP tunnels definitions; - Netfilter; - TCP network protocol; - Locking primitives; - 9P file system network protocol; - B.A.T.M.A.

CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.7%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-72472?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list

Lingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear to have issues.

Generally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock list to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However, functions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot adhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall may take a long time.

To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi->rwsem for the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach. Although nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead, this is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state instances.

Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi->rwsem in this case.

Furthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), the functions nfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they call locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi->rwsem. Simply adding this protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to locks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk.

Regarding the bug fixed by commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), it has been resolved after commit 0460253913e5 ("NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering state recovery") because all slots are drained before calling nfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path.

Also, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either since when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is sent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore, nfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first time the stateid is set.

Source: NVD