CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-72014

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Aug 15, 2026Sources checked Nov 10, 2026

9.8CRITICALCVSS out of 10

What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-72014 and is rated Critical severity with a CVSS score of 9.8. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Oct 2, 2026

Vendor remediation details

This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - ARM64 architecture; - S390 architecture; - x86 architecture; - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers; - InfiniBand drivers; - IOMMU subsystem; - Multiple devices driver; - Network drivers; - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver; - NVME drivers; - TCM subsystem; - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem; - Xen hypervisor drivers; - AFS file system; - File systems infrastructure; - Network file systems library; - Network file system (NFS) client; - NTFS3 file system; - OCFS2 file system; - OrangeFS file system; - SMB network file system; - IPv4 networking; - Sun RPC protocol; - IPv6 networking; - IP tunnels definitions; - Netfilter; - TCP network protocol; - Locking primitives; - 9P file system network protocol; - B.A.T.M.A.

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 30, 2026

Vendor remediation details

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Sep 29, 2026

Vendor remediation details

CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog

EPSS0.7%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability

Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field

Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships

Overview

What is CVE-2026-72014?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drbd: reject data replies with an out-of-range payload size

recv_dless_read() receives a P_DATA_REPLY from a peer into the bio of an outstanding read request. The peer-supplied payload length reaches it as the signed int data_size, and two peer-controlled inputs can make it negative.

With a negotiated data-integrity-alg the digest length is subtracted first, so a reply whose payload is smaller than the digest underflows data_size. With no integrity algorithm (the default) data_size is assigned from the unsigned h95/h100 wire length and drbdd() never bounds it for a payload-carrying command, so a length above INT_MAX casts it negative; this path needs no non-default feature.

The bio receive loop then computes expect = min_t(int, data_size, bv_len), which is negative, and drbd_recv_all_warn(mapped, expect) receives with a size_t of SIZE_MAX into the first mapped page.

The sibling receive path read_in_block() is not affected: it uses an unsigned size and rejects it against DRBD_MAX_BIO_SIZE before receiving. Reject a data reply whose size is negative after the optional digest subtraction, covering both triggers.

Impact: a malicious or man-in-the-middle DRBD peer copies attacker-chosen bytes past a bio page in the receiver, corrupting kernel memory. A node that reads from its peer (a diskless node, or read-balancing to the peer) is exposed in the default configuration; data-integrity-alg is not required.

Source: NVD