← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2026-46113

Vulnerability intelligence

Published May 28, 2026Sources checked Oct 28, 2026
8.8HIGHCVSS out of 10
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2026-46113 and is rated High severity with a CVSS score of 8.8. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Ubuntu Security Notices guidance

Vendor revision: Aug 18, 2026
Vendor remediation details

This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - x86 architecture; - InfiniBand drivers; - Media drivers; - Network drivers; - Mellanox network drivers; - Texas Instruments network drivers; - NVME drivers; - File systems infrastructure; - SMB network file system; - IPv4 networking; - Network traffic control; - TCP network protocol; - Locking primitives; - Memory management; - IPv6 networking; - Multipath TCP; - Netfilter; - RxRPC session sockets; - SCTP protocol; - SMC sockets; (CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31501, CVE-2026-31589, CVE-2026-31633, CVE-2026-31636, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-43198, CVE-2026-43379, CVE-2026-43465, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46331, CVE-2026-52924, CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53131, CVE

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Jun 9, 2026

CBL-Mariner Releases

Vendor-listed releases

  • 6.6.141.1-1
CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2026-46113?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Fix shadow paging use-after-free due to unexpected GFN

The shadow MMU computes GFNs for direct shadow pages using sp->gfn plus the SPTE index. This assumption breaks for shadow paging if the guest page tables are modified between VM entries (similar to commit aad885e77496, "KVM: x86/mmu: Drop/zap existing present SPTE even when creating an MMIO SPTE", 2026-03-27).

The flow is as follows:

- a PDE is installed for a 2MB mapping, and a page in that area is accessed. KVM creates a kvm_mmu_page consisting of 512 4KB pages; the kvm_mmu_page is marked by FNAME(fetch) as direct-mapped because the guest's mapping is a huge page (and thus contiguous).

- the PDE mapping is changed from outside the guest.

- the guest accesses another page in the same 2MB area. KVM installs a new leaf SPTE and rmap entry; the SPTE uses the "correct" GFN (i.e. based on the new mapping, as changed in the previous step) but that GFN is outside of the [sp->gfn, sp->gfn + 511] range; therefore the rmap entry cannot be found and removed when the kvm_mmu_page is zapped.

- the memslot that covers the first 2MB mapping is deleted, and the kvm_mmu_page for the now-invalid GPA is zapped. However, rmap_remove() only looks at the [sp->gfn, sp->gfn + 511] range established in step 1, and fails to find the rmap entry that was recorded by step 3.

- any operation that causes an rmap walk for the same page accessed by step 3 then walks a stale rmap and dereferences a freed kvm_mmu_page. This includes dirty logging or MMU notifier invalidations (e.g., from MADV_DONTNEED).

The underlying issue is that KVM's walking of shadow PTEs assumes that if a SPTE is present when KVM wants to install a non-leaf SPTE, then the existing kvm_mmu_page must be for the correct gfn. Because the only way for the gfn to be wrong is if KVM messed up and failed to zap a SPTE... which shouldn't happen, but *actually* only happens in response to a guest write.

That bug dates back literally forever, as even the first version of KVM assumes that the GFN matches and walks into the "wrong" shadow page. However, that was only an imprecision until 2032a93d66fa ("KVM: MMU: Don't allocate gfns page for direct mmu pages") came along.

Fix it by checking for a target gfn mismatch and zapping the existing SPTE. That way the old SP and rmap entries are gone, KVM installs the rmap in the right location, and everyone is happy.

Source: NVD