← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2024-51744

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Nov 4, 2024Sources checked Oct 5, 2026
3.1LOWCVSS out of 10
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2024-51744 and is rated Low severity with a CVSS score of 3.1. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Aug 12, 2026
Vendor remediation details

CBL-Mariner Releases

Vendor-listed releases

  • 1.29.4-14
  • 0.59.0-27
  • 10.25.1-4
  • 1.4.0-25
  • 3.5.21-1
  • 1.9.5-11
  • 3.5.18-1
  • 3.10.182-1
  • 2.45.4-12
  • 1.31.0-6
  • 1.30.10-5
  • 2.14.1-6
  • 1.2.0-18
  • 1.7.7-1
  • 2.7.5-3
  • 1.9.5-8
  • 0.24.2-13
  • 1.12.15-1
  • 1.11.4-1
  • 25.0.3-13
  • 24.0.9-17
  • 2.6.1-22
  • 0.0.2-22
  • 1.11.1-18
  • 2.4.0-29
  • 1.28.4-17
  • 1.6.2-26
  • 8.4.0-24
  • 1.11.2-22
  • 1.2.0-21
  • 2.37.9-4
  • 3.2.236-21
CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.5%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2024-51744?

golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Unclear documentation of the error behavior in `ParseWithClaims` can lead to situation where users are potentially not checking errors in the way they should be. Especially, if a token is both expired and invalid, the errors returned by `ParseWithClaims` return both error codes. If users only check for the `jwt.ErrTokenExpired ` using `error.Is`, they will ignore the embedded `jwt.ErrTokenSignatureInvalid` and thus potentially accept invalid tokens. A fix has been back-ported with the error handling logic from the `v5` branch to the `v4` branch. In this logic, the `ParseWithClaims` function will immediately return in "dangerous" situations (e.g., an invalid signature), limiting the combined errors only to situations where the signature is valid, but further validation failed (e.g., if the signature is valid, but is expired AND has the wrong audience). This fix is part of the 4.5.1 release. We are aware that this changes the behaviour of an established function and is not 100 % backwards compatible, so updating to 4.5.1 might break your code. In case you cannot update to 4.5.0, please make sure that you are properly checking for all errors ("dangerous" ones first), so that you are not running in the case detailed above.

Source: NVD