← Back to CVE intelligence
CVE intelligence

CVE-2024-50010

Vulnerability intelligence

Published Oct 21, 2024Sources checked Oct 24, 2026
4.7MEDIUMCVSS out of 10
What this means

Review the available evidence

CVE-2024-50010 and is rated Medium severity with a CVSS score of 4.7. It is not in the current CISA KEV record we collected. That does not prove exploitation has not occurred.

What to do next

Remediation and response

Microsoft Security Response Center guidance

Vendor revision: Aug 12, 2026

CBL-Mariner Releases

Vendor-listed releases

  • 5.15.176.3-1
  • 6.6.64.2-9
CISA KEVNot listedBased on the latest collected catalog
EPSS0.2%Estimated 30-day exploitation probability
Ransomware useNot markedCISA KEV ransomware field
Threat actors0Source-linked actor relationships
Overview

What is CVE-2024-50010?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

exec: don't WARN for racy path_noexec check

Both i_mode and noexec checks wrapped in WARN_ON stem from an artifact of the previous implementation. They used to legitimately check for the condition, but that got moved up in two commits: 633fb6ac3980 ("exec: move S_ISREG() check earlier") 0fd338b2d2cd ("exec: move path_noexec() check earlier")

Instead of being removed said checks are WARN_ON'ed instead, which has some debug value.

However, the spurious path_noexec check is racy, resulting in unwarranted warnings should someone race with setting the noexec flag.

One can note there is more to perm-checking whether execve is allowed and none of the conditions are guaranteed to still hold after they were tested for.

Additionally this does not validate whether the code path did any perm checking to begin with -- it will pass if the inode happens to be regular.

Keep the redundant path_noexec() check even though it's mindless nonsense checking for guarantee that isn't given so drop the WARN.

Reword the commentary and do small tidy ups while here.

[brauner: keep redundant path_noexec() check]

Source: NVD